5 Canadian ice hockey gamers accused of sexually assaulting a lady had been all acquitted by an Ontario choose on Thursday.

In a packed courtroom, Justice Maria Carroccia reviewed testimony and proof from the extremely publicised eight-week trial over the course of a number of hours earlier than declaring the lads not responsible.

The previous gamers for Canada’s world junior hockey group had been accused of assaulting the lady, generally known as EM, in a resort room in 2018 in London, Ontario, the place they’d attended a Hockey Canada gala.

Justice Carroccia stated she didn’t discover EM’s proof “credible or dependable”. She added that “the Crown can’t meet its onus on any of the counts earlier than me”.

The central challenge of the trial was whether or not EM, who was 20 on the time, had consented to each sexual act within the room that night time.

Attorneys for the gamers contended that she requested the lads to have intercourse along with her they usually believed she gave consent.

Michael McLeod, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton and Carter Hart had been all gamers with the Nationwide Hockey League (NHL) when the allegations surfaced, though one was taking part in in Europe. Just one, Mr Hart, testified in his personal defence.

The trial attracted vital consideration in Canada, and so many individuals attended courtroom to listen to the ruling on Thursday that clerks needed to open two further overflow rooms.

In explaining her ruling, Justice Carroccia pointed to inconsistencies in EM’s testimony, together with about who had purchased drinks that night time, and stated EM’s statements mirrored an “unsure reminiscence” that didn’t line up with proof offered within the trial.

There have been variations in what the lady informed police investigators and people for Hockey Canada, which settled a C$3.5m ($2.5m; £1.9m) lawsuit for an undisclosed sum in 2022, as effectively, the choose stated.

All through the trial, the Crown argued the lady’s testimony was credible, that “intoxication doesn’t equal unreliability” and that any inconsistencies in her testimony had been minor.

In addition they argued the lady didn’t have a motive to manufacture a narrative and that she had initially reported the alleged assault to police in 2018, 4 years earlier than submitting the lawsuit towards Hockey Canada.

They added that textual content messages between the gamers allegedly confirmed it was Mr McLeod’s concept to ask his teammates to the room and that the gamers allegedly engaged in “getting their story straight” by drafting a story that EM had consented to all sexual exercise.

Defence legal professionals, nonetheless, argued that EM’s testimony was undermined by eyewitness proof , by which different gamers who had been within the resort room that night time however who weren’t charged stated she was “vocal” about what she needed sexually.

They stated the proof urged the lady was a keen participant who later skilled remorse, and added that intoxication on this case didn’t equal “incapacity”, submitting video proof suggesting EM had not proven indicators of maximum intoxication.

This breaking information story is being up to date and extra particulars can be printed shortly. Please refresh the web page for the fullest model.

You may obtain Breaking Information on a smartphone or pill by way of the BBC Information App. It’s also possible to comply with @BBCBreaking on X to get the most recent alerts.